Vampires in Twilight

| 11/26/2008 2:19:18 PM

Tags: ,

Quite a few books starring vampires live on my bookshelves. Anita Blake, the heroine of Laurell K. Hamilton’s series, loves a vampire named Jean-Claude and a werewolf named Richard. The Dresden Files by Jim Butcher features vampires from the Red Court, the Black Court and the White Court. Carrie Vaughn’s Kitty series stars a shapeshifter while a few vampires make appearances, too. A number of authors, including Maggie Shayne and Charlaine Harris, combine love and mystery with a healthy (unhealthy?) dose of the undead. And of course, Ann Rice’s Vampire Chronicles are classics.

Blood Noir is the latest Anita Blake novel by Laurell K. Hamilton.  Charlaine Harris writes the Southern Vampire Mysteries, which are now the basis of the HBO series True Blood.

On television, I still miss the recently cancelled Moonlight, which I understand is to be repeated in the near future on Sci-Fi Channel. Lots of us watched Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Angel, both series featuring Angel, the vampire with a soul, and Spike, a not-so-nice vampire we loved anyway, as well as a host of others.  Forever Knight, a cop drama with a vampire on the night shift trying to atone for his un-life and yearning to become human, was a favorite of mine back in the day. TV’s love of vampires goes back to the daytime drama Dark Shadows, at least in my memory. I’m sure there were other such programs in television’s early years.

The cover of a DVD set for Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Jared Padalecki and Jensen Ackles star as Sam and Dean Winchester in CW's Supernatural.

Nowadays, the Winchester brothers in Supernatural have been known to stake a few vampires, among other things that go bump in the night. And HBO’s new series (based on books written by Charlaine Harris with protagonist Sookie Stackhouse) True Blood captures new fans each and every week.

Bela Lugosi as Dracula.

Jean Teller
12/1/2008 8:32:57 AM

And the last sentence: But I feel that accurate knowledge of the cultural history of the vampire tradition is important. A lot of misinformation has become "common wisdom" among readers, and it's a shame, because the real facts are much more interesting! I totally agree, Inanna! Thanks!

Jean Teller
12/1/2008 8:31:42 AM

Thank you, Inanna, for setting the record straight. I definitely fell into the "too-quick-research" mode with that one! Unfortunately, our system cut off a portion of Inanna's comments. So here's the continuation: ....Rare Article Archive ( ). Vampire folklore is specific to European culture. At the beginning of the Twentieth Century, folklorists George R. Stetson, Dudley Wright and Montague Summers argued for a Universal Vampire Myth, claiming that "every culture in the world has a type of vampire." They were quite wrong. These writers fell into the same Eurocentric fallacy of many scholars of their era, such as Sir James Fraser. They added up superficial similarities and decided that any folk belief with any one of the characteristics of vampires as described in the Eastern European panics was "a type of vampire." If it drank blood, returned from the grave, was a supernatural creature that preyed on children and babies, or pestered people for sex, it was "a type of vampire." Everyone has seen the long catalogs and encyclopedia of "vampires" from every known country and era. But each of these creatures has its own cultural context and origin, and they're no more "types of vampires" than the native peoples encountered by Columbus were really misplaced Hindus. Bram Stoker basically recreated vampire fiction conventions with his novel Dracula. He freely invented a number of the conventions that became "vampire canon," including the vampire's lack of a reflection, vampires having to be invited before they could come inside, the vampire needing special earth to sleep in, and the association of vampires and bats. None of these are found in folklore or earlier fiction. Vampire fiction writers have complete freedom to create the kinds of stories they and their readers enjoy. But I feel that accurate knowledge of the cultural history of the vampire t

Inanna Arthen
11/30/2008 12:41:39 AM

I'm always delighted to encounter another vampire fiction enthusiast, but I'm afraid you've stumbled into one of the pitfalls of doing research on Wikipedia. Prince Vlad Tepes Dracula had absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the origins of vampire folklore. The notion that Vlad was "the first vampire" or "the inspiration for vampire legends" is a fanciful extension of the older misinformation that Vlad Tepes was "the inspiration for Bram Stoker's character of Dracula" which is also completely untrue. (See the work of Dr. Elizabeth Miller, Vlad Tepes was about as bloodthirsty and ruthless as most other 15th century warlords. His deeds are only widely remembered today thanks to the book by Raymond T. McNally and Radu Florescu (In Search of Dracula, 1973), which did not compare Vlad's record with that of his contemporaries. Vlad was and is a national hero in Romania, where they consider our association of him with vampires to be insulting. He was viewed as a great Christian warrior against the Muslim empire, and if he was "a devil," it was only to his enemies. He probably learned his famous "impaling" technique from the Turks, who were still practicing it in 1700, according to De Tournefort. Vampire folklore as we know it became widespread when an epidemic of panics began to spread across areas of Europe predominated by the Orthodox Church in the mid-17th century (200 years after the time of Vlad Tepes). These panics continued for over a century and bamboozled academics and scientists who investigated them. It was these myths that became widely known in English speaking countries by the early 18th century, and which were the basis for early fiction like The Vampyre and Carmilla. At that time, Vlad Tepes was virtually forgotten outside of Romania. You can read some of the early non-fiction works discussing vampire legends in my Rare Article Archive (http://by

Live The Good Life with GRIT!

Grit JulAug 2016At GRIT, we have a tradition of respecting the land that sustains rural America. That's why we want you to save money and trees by subscribing to GRIT through our automatic renewal savings plan. By paying now with a credit card, you save an additional $6 and get 6 issues of GRIT for only $16.95 (USA only).

Or, Bill Me Later and send me one year of GRIT for just $22.95!

Facebook Pinterest Instagram YouTube Twitter

Free Product Information Classifieds