How the Conservation Movement is Flawed


A photo of Mishelle ShepardThe very premise behind the conservation movement is grossly flawed. Society has been trying to force restraint and discipline over our lives since abundance first arrived on our horizon, but as a whole, we’re very resistant to that sort of manipulation. We wouldn’t have to push such restrictions on ourselves through religions or laws or social mores if we were already predestined toward moderation. We tend to very easily forget that conservation today most likely equals surpluses tomorrow.

So why on earth would the conservation movement make its platform, well, conservation? It was doomed from the beginning. We no longer think of the word conservation as synonymous with protection and preservation, we view it closer to quotas, controls, restrictions. The conservation movement may not have caused such connotations, but it sure ain’t helping. Rationing means war, at least it once did, and now not even for war and recession have we been proven that willing to conserve.

We are a species who has survived and thrived because we are drawn to abundance, not preprogrammed to conserve. During periods of lean times we have been forced to learn the hard way, repeatedly, but it never really sticks. The next year, or decade, or generation, we have completely forgotten about that hardship again, and we are once again absorbed in our visions of abundance.

In society we honor and reward the man who earns so much he can’t possibly ever spend it all over the man who may work equally hard but at a fraction of the wages, even if we know the rich man to be lacking in character. Why is that? We always reward abundance – abundance in beauty, skill, achievement, talent, even formerly in obesity, back when that was a sign of material abundance. Now that obesity is usually a sign of malnutrition, we don’t value it anymore. In this country an abundance of garbage doesn’t bother us at all, because it’s still an abundance. So until there is a lack of space that makes the abundance of garbage excessively unpleasant, we are very unlikely to do anything about it.

When reality has stepped in and shown us a real truth about human nature – an unpleasant sort of truth along the lines of prostitutes, abortions, and drugs will always exist, until the end of time, no matter what we do to try to change that – you sometimes wish folks would start working with human nature instead of against it. So here is another unpleasant truth: We will never embrace conservation as a concept, because it’s just not attractive. As Bryan Welch writes in his recent article for MOTHER EARTH NEWS, Creating a Sustainable Society: Four Questions We Should Ask, “Austerity is a drag. Most people know that - and resist it.”

There is a very simple formula to change all this. I’ll bet you can guess it. Try right now in the comments section and I’ll tell ya if you’re right next week!

Roy Henderson
4/15/2010 6:08:30 AM

I have to say you have some nice melons there! I have chickens that I cut up older fruit for and was wondering what the nutritional vale might be for something like what you have there?

3/22/2010 12:23:36 PM

What a wonderful compliment Nebraska Dave, I am sincerely thankful and love reading your thoughts and insights!

Nebraska Dave
3/18/2010 6:10:33 PM

Mishelle, Hmmmm, this blog entry makes me think a little. I always have and probably always will be a reactionary and not a visionary. A problem has to reach up and whack me in the wallet before I will get too excited. I’m getting better but I doubt that I’ll ever become a philosophical activist. The idea about being drawn to abundance is quite interesting and totally makes sense. Many of the generation that endured the 1930s and extreme hard times became hoarders, savers, and frugal the rest of their lives. The boomer generation became the spenders, throw it away don’t fix it, instant gratification generation. It accelerated us into a spend now and pay later society that can no long sustain itself. There are those that would say that we can not legislate conservation, morality, or good behavior. I would say that is true, however if there were no rules we would quickly revert into a chaotic, rebellious, barbaric, Neanderthal society that only would be ruled by the physically strongest. I always enjoy your blogs but you make me think. Sometimes it hurts but it’s always a good thing. I’m looking forward to your next brain exercising blog entry. As to the answer to your question, haven’t got a clue. I never was good at concept thinking, but give me something to take apart and put back together again and I’m your guy. I’ll be watching for the solution.

Live The Good Life with GRIT!

Grit JulAug 2016At GRIT, we have a tradition of respecting the land that sustains rural America. That's why we want you to save money and trees by subscribing to GRIT through our automatic renewal savings plan. By paying now with a credit card, you save an additional $6 and get 6 issues of GRIT for only $16.95 (USA only).

Or, Bill Me Later and send me one year of GRIT for just $22.95!

Facebook Pinterest Instagram YouTube Twitter

Free Product Information Classifieds Newsletters