The Debate Over Raw Dairy Milk

Wisconsin event offers information on raw dairy milk to producers and consumers.
Andy Sell
July/August 2010
Add to My MSN

The raw milk debate rages on throughout rural America.
iStockphoto.com/Peter-John Freeman


Content Tools

Related Content

Top 10 Reasons to Keep a Jersey Cow

A milk cow can make a great addition to your homestead. Here are 10 reasons why!

Teaching a Dairy Cow Not To Kick

A simple way to stop a cow from kicking when you milk her.

Hubbard Life Delivers Expert Advice with High Quality Nutrition

Pet and livestock owners looking for high quality animal nutrition backed by expertise and support c...

Common Milkweed Oil Shows Promise in Cosmetics

Hank reports on some new uses for common milkweed.

One side urges freedom of choice. The other side argues that health is the top concern. And the debate over raw milk continues.

Nearly 300 people from around the world recently attended the Second Annual International Raw Milk Symposium in Madison, Wisconsin. The event was organized by the Farm to Consumer Foundation, a nonprofit organization focused on increasing education about food issues. The foundation is the primary source of income for the Farm to Consumer Legal Defense Fund, which states as its mission, “Defending the rights and broadening the freedoms of family farms, and protecting consumer access to raw milk and nutrient dense foods.”

The first symposium was held in Toronto to facilitate an international discussion regarding raw milk. In the year that followed, a flurry of activity occurred for both producers and consumers, including a victory by Canadian raw milk producer Michael Schmidt after a long and costly court battle, as well as a coordinated crackdown on raw milk producers in Wisconsin.

Raw milk advocates say the main issue concerning the product is freedom of choice. They cite claims that raw milk has helped people with health concerns such as asthma and immune issues, and that pasteurizing milk not only destroys harmful bacteria, it destroys good enzymes and proteins in the milk. Many supporters line up on the side of people knowing where their food comes from, and they advocate that consumers meet the dairy farmer and inspect a local farm’s facilities on a regular basis.

On the opposite side of the argument are government health officials who say pasteurized milk (milk that has been heated to up to 161°F for up to 20 seconds) is the only safe product for consumers, particularly the young, elderly or those with weakened immune systems. Citing several health outbreaks attributed to raw milk, officials say their one and only concern is the safety of the public. Officials at the Food and Drug Administration say consumption of unpasteurized milk caused at least 187 hospitalizations, 1,614 illnesses and two deaths from 1998 to 2008.

This year, the symposium focused on the health benefits of raw milk, and how this issue fits into the larger issue of consumer rights concerning food. The event took place even as debate continues regarding the legalities of selling and the safety of consuming raw milk. In Wisconsin, as this issue went to press, a recently forwarded bill – allowing limited sales of unpasteurized milk directly off the farm – had been vetoed by the governor.

The aim of the symposium was to educate people about milk and to help counter the anti-fresh milk outlook that pervades many state dairy-regulating bodies. Symposium participants concluded that the real issue is not whether raw milk is perfectly safe; it is that, as citizens, we have the right to choose whether we feed our families with fresh product directly from the farmer or a burger from a fast-food restaurant.








Post a comment below.

 

T BRANDT
1/28/2012 7:00:02 PM
Feeodm is the right to do anything The Law allows. Every time they issue a law or regulation, they subtract from our freedom. The first job of any bureaucrat is to ensure his own job and the excuse The Nannycrats use is usually that they are "protecting us." The second job of the bureaucrarts is to make it easy for the lawyers to file suits.: more regs means more suits...With freedom comes responsibility. Yes, the longer raw milk (or precessed) milk is kept, the higher the bacterial counts, and thus, health risks can accrue. But we should be able to make our own decisions about accepting risk vs gaining benefit. Citizens should remember this the next time they enter the voting booth. Personally, I'm getting very tired of sacrificing freedom to the lawyers & bureaucrats.

ALYCE ORTUZAR
1/28/2012 1:11:18 PM
What your article does not understand is the need for consumers to decide for themselves, based on their research, what is safe. Those government agencies that claim raw milk is unsafe do not have the evidence to support their claims. There is ample evidence to show that what these agencies tell the public is safe is in fact dangerous. The more adulterated, the more processes, the more money for corporate industries; the foods that are not processed reap the most money for the ecological farmers. Conventional animal products are unsafe to eat and are full of synthetic, endocrine-disruptinh hormones such as bovine growth hormone; antibiotics because the conditions of the confined animal feeding operations are unsanitary and inhumane. In addition, pesticides such as atrazine used on crops is an endocrine-disruptor scientifically linked to disfigured frogs and fish. We can only guess what these toxic chemicals paraded as food are doing to people. No government agency deserves credibility. Unfortunat3ely, your article leaves out these critically important facts.








Pay Now & Save 50% Off the Cover Price

First Name: *
Last Name: *
Address: *
City: *
State/Province: *
Zip/Postal Code:*
Country:
Email:*
(* indicates a required item)
Canadian subs: 1 year, (includes postage & GST). Foreign subs: 1 year, . U.S. funds.
Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
Non US and Canadian Subscribers - Click Here

Live The Good Life with Grit!

For more than 125 years, Grit has helped its readers live more prosperously and happily while emphasizing the importance of community and a rural lifestyle tradition. In each bimonthly issue, Grit includes helpful articles, humorous and inspiring articles, captivating photos, gardening and cooking advice, do-it-yourself projects and the practical reader advice you would expect to find in America’s premier rural lifestyle magazine.

Get your guide to living outside the city limits delivered straight to your mailbox. Subscribe to Grit today!  Simply fill in your information below to receive 1 year (6 issues) of Grit for only $19.95!

SPECIAL BONUS OFFER!

At Grit, we have a tradition of respecting the land that sustains rural America. That’s why we want you to save money and trees by subscribing to Grit through our automatic renewal savings plan. By paying now with a credit card, you save an additional $5 and get 6 issues of Grit for only $14.95 (USA only).

Or, Bill Me Later and send me one year of Grit for just $19.95!